Planned Murder Motivated by Revenge Prevented in Lori Region
In the course of the preliminary investigation of the criminal proceeding initiated in Lori Regional Investigative Department of the RA Investigative Committee it was found out that on September 20, 2025 H.T., a resident of the region in a group with his friend S.K., during the argument, complementing each other’s actions, hit the minor R.G. with hands and feet, then also with a cutting-piercing item on diufferent parts of his body, willfully causing heavy bodily damages threatening to life.
Then, a while after the incident, R.G., together with his friend A.T., acting as a group and complementing each other’s actions, planned and prepared to revenge, namely to kill H.T. and S.K.
Particularly, within the framework of the preliminary investigation it was grounded that R.G. was to meet H.T. and S.K. under the pretext of talking, and A.T. was to wait in a pre-selected hiding place, after which the latter was to come out of the hiding place and kill them together with R.G. with the firearms taken in advance then they were to flee along the chosen route and hide in a pre-planned location. However, the crime was prevented due to the large-scale investigative actions, as well as measures taken jointly with the officers of the Police Regional Department of the RA Ministry of Internal Affairs within the framework of the criminal proceeding initiated in Lori Regional Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee.
Besides, in the course of the preliminary investigation it was also grounded that in September, 2025, with the intent to cause bodily injury, R.G. stabbed minor D.M. on different parts of his body, causing damage of medium gravity to his health.
Public criminal prosecution was initiated against R.G. according to the Part 1 of the Article 43-155, the Points 4 and 8 of the Part 2 of the Article 167 of RA Criminal Code, against A.T. according to the Point 8 of the Part 2 of the Article 43-155 of RA Criminal Code.
Detention was applied as a pretrial measure against them.
Public criminal prosecution was initiated against S.K. and H.T. according to the Points 2 and 5 of the Part 2 of the Article 166 of RA Criminal Code.
Detention was applied as a pretrial measure against S.K., home detention against H.T..
The criminal proceeding with the bill of indictment was sent to the prosecutor.
